CVE Watch402,574 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

15,694en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,756

Nuevos KEV · 24H0

Exploit Today ≥ 701,689

Distribución · última ventana

Crítico
4,544
Alto
18,439
Medio
17,030
Bajo
1,708

Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades521–560 · 15,694

CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.

CVE-2026-1119654.3 MED

17.8%

——5The Profile Builder WordPress plugin from 4.0.0 to 4.0.4 does not enforce its reCAPTCHA verification on all comment submission paths, allowing authenticated users to bypass the anti-spam protection an administrator configured for the WordPress comment form.2d CVE-2026-107685—

19.5%

——6Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in the WebSocket streaming client in agentjido req_llm allows an on-path attacker to read and modify OpenAI WebSocket sessions, including the authorization bearer token, via a TLS certificate the client does not trust. ReqLLM.Streaming.WebSocketSession.Client.start/3 in lib/req_llm/streaming/web_socket_session/client.ex starts WebSockex without TLS options, and WebSockex defaults to insecure: true, which connects with verify: :verify_none. The option allowlist also drops any caller-supplied cacerts or ssl_options, so an application cannot turn verification on. The OpenAI Responses, Realtime, and Codex WebSocket paths reach this client and send the API key or OAuth access token in the authorization header. HTTP streaming through Finch and the HTTP/2 duplex session through Mint verify certificates and are not affected. This issue affects req_llm: from 1.9.0 before 1.29.0.2d CVE-2026-105963—

43.2%

——13Externally-Generated Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in plug_crypto in elixir-plug plug_crypto allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to expose the secret key base through application logs via a wrong-typed argument. Every public function in Plug.Crypto validates argument types in a function-head guard. A failed guard makes the Erlang VM raise FunctionClauseError with the actual argument values in the top stack frame, so the secret key base, a derived key, or the value an API key is compared against lands in that frame. The library's rescue blocks and Plug.Crypto.prune_args_from_stacktrace/1 only reach exceptions raised inside a function body, so they never see a guard failure. Plug.Cowboy and Bandit write the frame to the error log and attach it as crash_reason Logger metadata, which error trackers forward. Two entry points take request data. Plug.Crypto.verify/4 exposes the secret key base when the token is neither a binary nor nil, which Phoenix.Token.verify/4 reaches because it forwards the token unguarded. Plug.Crypto.secure_compare/2 exposes the other operand when one side is not a binary, as happens when a missing request header yields nil. Reading the leaked value needs separate access to the logs or the error tracker, so the request alone does not disclose the secret to the attacker. This issue affects plug: from 1.6.3 before 1.7.0; plug_crypto: from 1.0.0 before 2.2.1.2d CVE-2026-89320—

6.8%

——2`HmacShaCryptor.Hash` never hashed its input. For any input it returned `HMAC_K("")` — the MAC of the empty message under the key. Every AES-CBC-HMAC JWE produced or verified by gose therefore carried an authentication tag that is constant per key and independent of the message, removing ciphertext integrity entirely.2d CVE-2026-89319—

10.7%

——3`JweDirectDecryptorBlock.Decrypt` read a 64-bit plaintext length from the `_thales_aad` protected-header field and used it without any validation. A truncated field panics `binary.BigEndian.Uint64`, an oversized value drives an unbounded allocation, and a value larger than the decrypted block panics with a slice-bounds error.2d CVE-2026-89318—

5.9%

——2`JweRsaKeyEncryptionDecryptorImpl.Decrypt` passed the JWE's initialization vector to `cipher.AEAD.Open` without checking its length. The Go standard library **panics** rather than returning an error when a GCM nonce is not exactly `NonceSize()` bytes, so a JWE carrying a wrong-sized IV crashes the decrypting goroutine.2d CVE-2026-89317—

3.9%

——1gose parsed the JWS `crit` header into `JwsHeader.Crit` and then never read it. RFC 7515 §4.1.11 requires a recipient to reject a JWS whose listed critical extension parameters it does not understand. gose implements no header extensions, so every token carrying a non-empty `crit` should have been rejected — and none were.2d CVE-2026-89316—

10.7%

——3`LoadPublicKey` resolved an EC key's curve with an unchecked type assertion, `algToOptsMap[alg].(*ECDSAOptions)`. A JWK declaring `"kty":"EC"` together with a non-EC `"alg"` — which RFC 7517 §4.4 permits — reaches that assertion and **panics**.2d CVE-2026-89315—

16.6%

——5`JwtClaims.MarshalJSON` built a Go struct at runtime with `reflect.StructOf`, synthesising a field named `"A" + claimName` for each untyped claim. `reflect.StructOf` **panics** when a field name is not a valid Go identifier, or when it duplicates another field. Both conditions are reachable from ordinary JWT claim names.2d CVE-2026-89314—

16.6%

——5`jwkFields.CheckConsistency` detected duplicate `key_ops` entries with a pairwise nested loop, making validation cost grow with the **square** of the entry count. Because the check runs on every JWK and JWKS unmarshal, a modestly sized but hostile JWKS document could occupy a CPU core for many seconds.2d CVE-2026-89313—

13.3%

——4`JwksTrustStore.Get` assigned each parsed key to the function's **named return value** while refreshing the JWKS cache. When the requested `kid` was not present, the trailing naked `return` handed the caller the last key in the JWKS document together with a `nil` error — a confidently wrong answer instead of "not found".2d CVE-2026-89312—

19.8%

——6`AesGcmCryptor.Open` passed a caller-supplied nonce straight to `cipher.AEAD.Open` without checking its length. The Go standard library **panics** rather than returning an error when a GCM nonce is not exactly `NonceSize()` bytes, so a JWE carrying a wrong-sized IV crashes the decrypting goroutine.2d CVE-2026-257849.8 CRÍ

27.8%

——8Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default vulnerability in Hallo Welt! GmbH BlueSpice (container image bluespice/wiki) allows privilege escalation. The default value of $mwsgTokenAuthenticatorServiceCIDR in the container's LocalSettings.php was intended to restrict internal service authentication to the container network, but evaluated to an empty string when the environment variable WIKI_SERVICE_TOKEN_AUTH_ALLOWED was not set. An empty value disables the IP restriction in the token authenticator component (mwstake/mediawiki-component-token-authenticator). As a result, any user with read access to the wiki (anonymous users on publicly readable wikis) could obtain an application token from the REST API and use it to get a session with sysop privileges as the internal service user. This issue affects BlueSpice: from 5.2.3 before 5.2.7, and the 5.2.7 container images published before 2026-10-19 15:37 UTC.2d CVE-2026-257167.1 ALT

7.8%

——2Missing Authorization vulnerability in Hallo Welt! GmbH BlueSpice (Extension:BlueSpiceUserManager) allows any authenticated user without special privileges to block or unblock arbitrary user accounts, including administrators. The REST endpoints /bs-usermanager/v1/block/create and /bs-usermanager/v1/block/delete call UserManager::blockUser() and UserManager::unblockUser(), which do not verify the permissions of the acting user. This allows locking out all administrators (denial of service) and lifting blocks imposed by administrators. This issue affects BlueSpice: from 5.0.0 before 5.1.11, from 5.2.0 before 5.2.7.2d CVE-2026-16762—

43.7%

——13An attacker able to supply a crafted XML document to an application using QXmlStreamReader can cause disproportionate CPU consumption during parsing, making the application unresponsive (denial of service). Exploitation requires only that the application parse attacker-influenced XML; no authentication, privileges, or user interaction beyond ingesting the input are needed. There is no loss of confidentiality or integrity — no data disclosure, data modification, or code execution — and the impact is contained to the affected process.2d CVE-2026-115657—

3.4%

——1When used as an executor in either KNIME Server or KNIME Business Hub, KNIME Analytics Platform LTS versions before 5.8.4 log configured credentials of proxies during startup. An attacker with access to log files can steal the credentials and use the proxy as the user who configured the proxy settings. The issue has been fixed in LTS versions 5.8.4 and 5.12.0 and later.2d CVE-2026-1128629.8 CRÍ

34.8%

——10Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in xnau webdesign Participants Database participants-database allows Object Injection.This issue affects Participants Database: from n/a through 2.7.8.5.2d CVE-2026-1128609.3 CRÍ

25.1%

——8Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in xnau webdesign Participants Database participants-database allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Participants Database: from n/a through 2.7.8.5.2d CVE-2026-1128387.1 ALT

8.6%

——3Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in e4jvikwp VikRentCar vikrentcar allows Stored XSS.This issue affects VikRentCar: from n/a through 1.4.8.2d CVE-2026-1128378.5 ALT

23.1%

——7Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Ruben Garcia GamiPress gamipress allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects GamiPress: from n/a through 8.0.7.2d CVE-2026-1128357.1 ALT

8.6%

——3Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in e4jvikwp VikRentCar vikrentcar allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects VikRentCar: from n/a through 1.4.8.2d CVE-2026-1128256.5 MED

19.6%

——6Missing Authorization vulnerability in Magepeople inc. Car Rental Manager car-rental-manager allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Car Rental Manager: from n/a through 1.5.3.2d CVE-2026-1128216.5 MED

10.7%

——3Missing Authorization vulnerability in Knit Pay Knit Pay knit-pay allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Knit Pay: from n/a through 9.6.3.0.2d CVE-2026-1123597.5 ALT

24.4%

——7Missing Authorization vulnerability in Amauri.IO WPMobile.App wpappninja allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WPMobile.App: from n/a through 11.86.2d CVE-2025-58403—

42.6%

——13CGM CLININET is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) due to improper neutralization of user-supplied data. A remote unauthenticated attacker can craft a malicious URL containing JavaScript or HTML code, which is executed in the victim's browser when the URL is visited, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies and perform actions on behalf of the victim within the application. The vulnerability was confirmed to affect versions up to 2026.MS3 but later versions may also be vulnerable.2d CVE-2025-30054—

0.8%

——0CGM CLININET is vulnerable to local privilege escalation. The service that processes incoming HL7 messages runs with root privileges, but due to incorrect permissions, its scripts and configuration files can be modified by the uhcapache user. An attacker with uhcapache privileges can modify these files to execute arbitrary code as root. The vulnerability was confirmed to affect versions up to 2026.MS3 but later versions may also be vulnerable.2d CVE-2025-30053—

28.6%

——9The CGM CLININET application runs the cgm-updater process listening on an open network port without any authentication. The vulnerability was confirmed to affect versions up to 2026.MS3 but later versions may also be vulnerable.2d CVE-2025-30052—

27.5%

——8The rsyncd service of the CGM CLININET is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass via IP spoofing. Access is granted based solely on the client's source IP address. An attacker able to spoof an allowed IP address, can bypass this check and gain the ability to edit files on the affected system. The vulnerability was confirmed to affect versions up to 2026.MS3 but later versions may also be vulnerable.2d CVE-2025-30051—

0.7%

——0The CGM CLININET application stores the production database login and password, as well as RabbitMQ broker credentials, in the SysIO.pl configuration file. Insecure file permissions make this file readable by any local account. This issue was fixed in version 2026.MS32d CVE-2025-30050—

12.7%

——4CGM CLININET is vulnerable to Code Injection in the RunCGI.pm component, which dynamically imports the module specified as a query parameter and executes code from untrusted data provided by the user. An attacker from adjacent network can supply a crafted query parameter to have an attacker-controlled module imported which results in arbitrary code execution with root privileges. This issue was fixed in version 2026.MS32d CVE-2025-30049—

11.0%

——3The CGM CLININET application stores user passwords as unsalted MD5 hashes. This issue was fixed in versions 2026.MS1 and 2026.MS32d CVE-2025-30047—

31.6%

——9CGM CLININET is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution caused by deserialization of untrusted data. The server exposes an HTTP-based API, used by the administrative module, that exchanges data using Java object serialization. An attacker within the same local network is able to send requests to this API and transmit a crafted serialized object. When it is deserialized, it allows arbitrary code execution with root privileges on the server. This issue was fixed in version 2026.MS32d CVE-2025-30046—

18.0%

——5In the CGM CLININET application server, multiple processes responsible for HL7 communication with external systems run with root privileges while processing untrusted data received from those external systems. An attacker in adjacent network able to send data to these HL7 communication processes can achieve remote code execution with root privileges. The vulnerability was confirmed to affect versions up to 2026.MS3 but later versions may also be vulnerable.2d CVE-2025-30045—

9.6%

——3CGM CLININET is vulnerable to Code Injection in the ConvExpr function, which processes Perl expressions into RTF document content. Due to improper control of the code evaluated from these expressions, an authenticated, high-privileged attacker can cause arbitrary code to be executed with root privileges. The vulnerability was confirmed to affect versions up to 2026.MS3 but later versions may also be vulnerable.2d CVE-2025-30043—

10.7%

——3CGM CLININET is vulnerable to Missing Authentication for Critical Function in the /DocManagment path. The endpoint is accessible without authentication, allowing an unauthenticated attacker in the adjacent network to retrieve the list of patient documents and download those documents. This issue was fixed in version 2026.MS32d CVE-2026-93489—

13.8%

——4Improper Authentication in ASUS router modules allows an unauthenticated nearby user to send an HTTP request and forge an access ticket, subsequently enabling the user to perform administrator operations. Refer to the ' Security Update for ASUS Router Firmware ' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information.2d CVE-2026-75779—

68.1%

——20Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (“OS Command Injection”) and Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in an ASUS router model allow an attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into visiting a phishing website, causing the router to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Refer to the ' Security Update for ASUS Router Firmware ' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information.2d CVE-2026-75775—

48.6%

——15Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command in certain ASUS routers allows remote user to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges via crafted parameters sent to the router while the device is in its factory-default state.Refer to the ' Security Update for ASUS Router Firmware ' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information.2d CVE-2026-632449.8 CRÍ

51.1%

——15An authentication bypass vulnerability in WizLearn Technologies' Learning Management System (LMS) could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass password authentication and the OAuth authentication flow by sending a specially crafted POST request, potentially resulting in unauthorised access to user accounts and full administrative control of the LMS platform.2d CVE-2026-4952—

20.7%

——6The "ASMobile" web interface, which is part of the VertiGIS software package "GIS Portal", allows authenticated users to define a business reference. JavaScript code can be inserted into this field. On its own this only affects the user who entered it (self-XSS). However, the business reference is included in the order details when the user places an order through the web interface. The order is later listed in the OrderAdministration portal (AuftragsManager) of VertiGIS WebOrderSystem, where the stored code is executed as soon as a highly privileged user opens the order. Version 7.0.8.6 of WebOrderSystem, the latest available at the time of testing, is affected. The vendor did not provide information about further affected versions.2d