PULSE
FEED
ransomqilin reclama a Rotstein & Shiffman · IL · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Max Fashion · AE · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Hallmark Cards, Inc. · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Scry Analytics · US · Technologyransomvexy ransomware reclama a ZipAI · VN · Technologyransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a W... R...ransomqilin reclama a Insurance Audit Services · US · Financial Servicesransomn0n reclama a Company #137 · CAransomn0n reclama a Company #136 · DKransomn0n reclama a Company #135 · IDransomn0n reclama a Company #134 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #133 · USransomredact reclama a Omni Hotels & Resorts · US · Hospitalityransomqilin reclama a Rotstein & Shiffman · IL · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Max Fashion · AE · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Hallmark Cards, Inc. · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Scry Analytics · US · Technologyransomvexy ransomware reclama a ZipAI · VN · Technologyransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a W... R...ransomqilin reclama a Insurance Audit Services · US · Financial Servicesransomn0n reclama a Company #137 · CAransomn0n reclama a Company #136 · DKransomn0n reclama a Company #135 · IDransomn0n reclama a Company #134 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #133 · USransomredact reclama a Omni Hotels & Resorts · US · Hospitality
CVE Watch408.702 no arquivo completo

Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje

17,405na visualização atual

Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.

No catálogo KEV1,768
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,700

Distribuição · última janela

  • Crítica
    5,718
  • Alta
    22,235
  • Média
    21,608
  • Baixa
    2,138
Filtros
Filtros

Janela

Severidade

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades16,721–16,760 · 17,405
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2026-568667.5 ALT
41.1%
——12When http.Transport sends an HTTP/1 CONNECT request with a non-empty Request.Body, it writes the body directly to the connection without framing after the request headers. If the server rejects the CONNECT request with a non-2xx keep-alive response, Transport returns the connection to the idle pool. Because CONNECT requests do not have a request body, the server may interpret the trailing body bytes as a subsequent pipelined HTTP/1.1 request on the connection, leaving the pooled connection desynchronized and causing the next caller that reuses it to read the response to the injected request. In reverse proxies (including httputil.ReverseProxy) that forward CONNECT requests through a shared Transport, this can lead to cross-user response poisoning.28d
CVE-2026-568579.8 CRÍ
46.4%
——14On Windows, when the target of Root.Mkdir or Root.MkdirAll is a junction pointing to an empty location, the operation can create a directory at the junction target even when that target is located outside the root. This only applies to operations where the last path component is a junction (path/to/junction, but not path/junction/target).28d
CVE-2026-107802—
9.4%
——3SumatraPDF is a multi-format reader for Windows. In 3.6.1 and earlier, src/SelectionTranslate.cpp embeds selected or pasted translation text in quoted Windows command lines using incomplete quote-only escaping. The affected BuildGrokTranslateCmdLineTemp(), BuildClaudeTranslateCmdLineTemp(), and BuildCodexTranslateCmdLineTemp() functions can allow attacker-controlled text to inject model, working-directory, approval, or sandbox-bypass flags when the corresponding agentic CLI backend is installed and used. No broader impact is claimed beyond the advisory-supported conditions. No fixed version is available as of this review.28d
CVE-2026-107738—
1.8%
——1SumatraPDF is a multi-format reader for Windows. In 3.6.1 and earlier, ChmFile::GetCharZ() narrows file-controlled unsigned string offsets from /#WINDOWS and /#IVB to signed integers without a lower-bound check. An offset that becomes negative can make the function read before the /#STRINGS buffer, causing deterministic application termination. No broader impact is claimed beyond the advisory-supported conditions. No fixed version is available as of this review.24d
CVE-2026-107737—
7.8%
——2SumatraPDF is a multi-format reader for Windows. In 3.6.1 and earlier, and in pre-release 3.7.0.20369 when WebView2 is absent or cannot initialize, ParseProtoUrl() accepts the signed host component of an its:// URL and FindHtmlWindowById() uses it directly as an index into gHtmlWindows. Opening a crafted CHM through the IE fallback backend with a negative or otherwise out-of-range window identifier can cause an out-of-bounds pointer read followed by an invalid object callback dereference and process termination. No fixed version is available as of this review.24d
CVE-2026-107736—
1.8%
——1SumatraPDF is a multi-format reader for Windows. In 3.6.1 and earlier, MaybeFlipBitmap() asks GDI+ to read the attacker-controlled PropertyTagOrientation size through GetPropertyItem() while supplying only a fixed 64-byte buf on the stack. Opening a crafted TIFF with enough EXIF Orientation values can cause attacker-selected bytes to overwrite stack control data, while tested builds terminate through the stack cookie check. No broader impact is claimed beyond the advisory-supported conditions. No fixed version is available as of this review.28d
CVE-2026-107735—
6.7%
——2SumatraPDF is a multi-format reader for Windows. In 3.6.1 and earlier, InitializePolicies() starts the sumatrapdfrestrict.ini path with gPolicyRestrictions set to Perm::All and only ORs permission bits, so the INI file never revokes permissions. Deploying SumatraPDF with this INI file, including a malformed file or zero-valued permission settings, can silently bypass configured disk, network, printing, registry, clipboard, preference, and fullscreen restrictions. The -restrict command-line path works correctly and is not affected. No fixed version is available as of this review.28d
CVE-2026-107734—
9.9%
——3SumatraPDF is a multi-format reader for Windows. In 3.5.2 and earlier, an attacker-controlled SyncTeX source filename is substituted for the %f placeholder in an external editor command line without safe Windows argument quoting, and the resulting command line is passed to CreateProcessW(). A user with an external editor configured or auto-detected who opens a PDF with a crafted .synctex.gz file and invokes inverse search can inject command-line flags; the resulting impact depends on the target editor interpreting those flags and can include unintended editor actions or code execution through a malicious extension. No broader impact is claimed beyond the advisory-supported conditions. No fixed version is available as of this review.28d
CVE-2026-107733—
4.8%
——1SumatraPDF is a multi-format reader for Windows. In 3.6.1 and earlier, FrameOnCommand() handles CmdExec by passing a null current-tab pointer to RunWithExe(), which dereferences WindowTab::filePath. A local process in the same interactive Windows session, at an integrity level greater than or equal to SumatraPDF's under Windows UIPI, can dispatch CmdExec over DDE or WM_COPYDATA while no document tab is open, causing abrupt process termination and loss of unsaved state. No broader impact is claimed beyond the advisory-supported conditions. No fixed version is available as of this review.24d
CVE-2026-107732—
2.7%
——1SumatraPDF is a multi-format reader for Windows. In 3.6.1 and earlier, untrusted document paths and PDF link targets are interpolated into notification text that ParseTip() interprets as trusted tip markup. When a user clicks an injected link, ExecuteTipLink() dispatches its CmdExec command and can execute an attacker-selected local program in the user's context. No broader impact is claimed beyond the advisory-supported conditions. No fixed version is available as of this review.24d
CVE-2026-1077315.5 MÉD
1.4%
——0SumatraPDF is a multi-format reader for Windows. In 3.7.0.22298, four independently reachable range-validation variants in src/LitDoc.cpp allow file-controlled offsets and sizes to overflow, narrow to negative values, or wrap before incomplete bounds checks. The affected calculations include contentOffset, the directory expression dirOff64 + dirLen64, and the decoded-section offset + size, along with secondary-header range handling. Opening a crafted LIT file that reaches one of these variants can cause invalid pointer reads and deterministic application termination. No broader impact is claimed beyond the advisory-supported conditions. No fixed version is available as of this review.28d
CVE-2026-1077305.5 MÉD
2.0%
——1SumatraPDF is a multi-format reader for Windows. In 3.7.0.22298, LitParseHeader() in src/LitDoc.cpp computes the attacker-controlled hdrLen + nPieces * 16 section offset using signed 32-bit arithmetic without validating the complete result. When the component values make that aggregate calculation overflow to a negative value, pointer construction reaches an invalid read in LitU32(), causing deterministic application termination. The supplied evidence does not demonstrate code execution, information disclosure, arbitrary read, or integrity impact. No fixed version is available as of this review.28d
CVE-2026-1077295.5 MÉD
3.8%
——1SumatraPDF is a multi-format reader for Windows. In 3.7.0.22298, src/MobiDoc.cpp narrows the untrusted unsigned mobiHdr.hdrLen field to a signed integer for validation; values above INT_MAX become negative and bypass the upper-bound check. When the EXTH flag is set, the original unsigned value is reused as a pointer offset, causing DecodeExthHeader() to read beyond the record buffer. Opening a crafted MOBI file can reliably terminate the application with a native access violation; no code execution, information disclosure, or integrity impact has been demonstrated. No fixed version is available as of this review.28d
CVE-2026-1077287.5 ALT
39.2%
——12Strawberry GraphQL is a library for creating GraphQL APIs. From 0.217.0 until 0.326.1, PermissionExtension.resolve() on a synchronous field resolver evaluates the result of has_permission() for truthiness. When a custom permission declares has_permission() as a normal function but returns an awaitable, supports_sync does not classify it as asynchronous, the awaitable is not awaited, and its inherently truthy object value permits the protected resolver to run even when the result would resolve to false. This affects synchronous field resolvers under both execute_sync() and execute(); permissions declared with async def has_permission() and synchronous permissions returning a boolean are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 0.326.1.24d
CVE-2026-1077273.7 BAI
37.4%
——11Strawberry GraphQL is a library for creating GraphQL APIs. From 0.312.3 until 0.327.2, the legacy graphql-ws subscription handler in strawberry/subscriptions/protocols/graphql_ws/handlers.py does not remove naturally completed operations from self.tasks and self.subscriptions. When max_subscriptions_per_connection is configured, a client on a persistent WebSocket connection can use distinct operation IDs for one-shot subscriptions to fill the connection's configured slots even after those subscriptions send complete, causing later legitimate operations on that connection to be rejected with Subscription limit reached. The modern graphql-transport-ws protocol and deployments without the configured per-connection cap are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 0.327.2.24d
CVE-2026-1076515.5 MÉD
7.8%
——2A flaw was found in Eye of GNOME (eog). A heap-based buffer overflow exists in the PNG metadata reader due to improper state handling when parsing split metadata chunks. A remote attacker could exploit this flaw by enticing a user into opening a specially crafted PNG file, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or a Denial of Service (DoS) via application crash.22h
CVE-2026-105674—
18.9%
——6TP-Link Tapo C325WB V2 generates the pre-shared key used by its local media streaming service with a time-seeded pseudo-random number generator, making the key predictable and recoverable. An unauthenticated attacker on the adjacent network can recover the key and authenticate to the media streaming service without valid user credentials.  Successful exploitation may allow an unauthenticated adjacent-network attacker to access and take over live video and audio streams, compromising the confidentiality and integrity of camera media.22d
CVE-2026-105673—
18.4%
——6An unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability exists in Tapo C325WB v2 in the RTSP streaming service on TCP port 554 when the Camera Account feature is enabled. A crafted pair of RTSP-over-HTTP tunneling requests can cause memory corruption and crash the streaming daemon.  Successful exploitation may allow an unauthenticated adjacent-network attacker to disrupt live video and related streaming functions until the affected service recovers or restarts.28d
CVE-2026-105672—
27.9%
——8TP-Link Tapo C325WB V2 contains an unauthenticated authorization bypass vulnerability in the HTTPS JSON API dispatcher on TCP port 443. An attacker on the adjacent network can append an onboarding-scoped object to a JSON request to bypass session verification and invoke privileged actions without authentication.  Successful exploitation may allow an unauthenticated adjacent-network attacker to access live video and audio, modify device settings, and obtain sensitive device information or secrets.22d
CVE-2026-100197—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.21d
CVE-2026-890918.8 ALT
41.6%
——12A flaw was found in ansible-core. When installing a collection with `ansible-galaxy collection install`, the archive extractor validates member paths using lexical path normalisation (os.path.abspath) instead of resolving symbolic links (os.path.realpath), and it performs no containment check on symlink-typed directory members before creating them. A crafted collection tarball can chain symlink directory entries so that a subsequent file member is written outside the intended destination directory. This allows an attacker who can get a victim to install a malicious collection to overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the user running ansible-galaxy, leading to code execution on the control node. This is a bypass of the fix for CVE-2020-10691.2d
CVE-2026-879803.1 BAI
5.4%
——2IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext storage of sensitive information in logs.22d
CVE-2026-848915.9 MÉD
23.2%
——7IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to use of hard-coded credentials.22d
CVE-2026-848757.5 ALT
38.5%
——12IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.22d
CVE-2026-842499.8 CRÍ
36.4%
——11IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2, and 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary management operations due to missing authentication for critical function.22d
CVE-2026-842478.1 ALT
33.0%
——10IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a path traversal vulnerability.23d
CVE-2026-842468.1 ALT
32.3%
——10IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.23d
CVE-2026-842307.5 ALT
18.2%
——5IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to a race condition resulting from concurrent unsynchronized writes to a shared map.23d
CVE-2026-842098.1 ALT
25.8%
——8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.23d
CVE-2026-841988.1 ALT
32.3%
——10IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.23d
CVE-2026-840588.1 ALT
31.9%
——10IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overrun in the TDS (Microsoft SQL Server) PRELOGIN packet decoder. A remote attacker who can send a specially crafted TDS PRELOGIN packet to a network monitored by an IBM Guardium Collector may cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code on the Collector appliance.23d
CVE-2026-840578.1 ALT
33.0%
——10IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.23d
CVE-2026-840358.1 ALT
32.3%
——10IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.23d
CVE-2026-840325.6 MÉD
4.9%
——1IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack due to improper certificate validation.23d
CVE-2026-829008.1 ALT
32.4%
——10IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to delete arbitrary files due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory.23d
CVE-2026-828958.1 ALT
32.3%
——10IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.23d
CVE-2026-819328.6 ALT
21.4%
——6IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify, or delete information in the back-end database.23d
CVE-2026-803819.8 CRÍ
24.0%
——7IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized SQL statements due to SQL injection.23d
CVE-2026-758759.8 CRÍ
48.5%
——15IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to path traversal.23d
CVE-2026-1078314.3 MÉD
7.5%
——2Jivejdon through 5.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to perform state-changing actions by abusing GET endpoints lacking anti-CSRF tokens. Attackers can lure authenticated users to crafted links targeting /account/protected/delAll, /account/protected/sub/delSub, or /message/updateAction to delete private messages and subscriptions or rename threads.28d